Football: reality TV
It appears that broadcasting giant ESPN has stepped in to save the day for English Premier League junkies as the company bid on, and won the rights to show 46 live matches this upcoming season and bucket load more up until 2013. The American TV network jumped in after Irish broadcaster Setanta failed to pay the English, and Scottish Premier Leagues the over 30 million pounds it owed them.
I actually like the programming that Setanta has to offer as they show a wide variety of British and European sports. But it seems they shot themselves in the foot when it came to football. I’m not sure if you’d call it greed or mismanagement that finally did the company in.
It seems that not too many football fans were willing to fork over the high monthly bills to subscribe to Setanta, especially if the corner pub had already paid for it. The simple solution to the lack of subscribers would have been to lower the monthly rate to a more affordable price and then watch as the subscriptions went up. But this is the world of high finance companies, where the barter system and common sense often take a back seat to profits.
If you’re running a business, I think the last thing you want to do is turn away money, no matter what amount it is if you’re making a profit. If I was a hotel owner and Jack the Lad came knocking on my door and offered me 10 quid for an empty room that usually goes for 50 pounds a night, well I think I’d be daft not to take it. The room’s going to sit empty, so a tenner in my pocket is definitely better than nothing.
But that’s not how big business works. Companies set a price and if you can’t pay it, they take a “screw you” attitude and turn and walk away. The problem is though, they’re walking away from what could be a very substantial profit. The more often they walk away, the more money lost until they eventually go belly up.
I remember when Setanta first came out in North America, they were very hard for local pubs to deal with due to the astronomical rates they were charging. It was rumoured they charged the pubs a price per head when people went to watch a game, and they had a representative there counting fans and collecting the coin. A few years later the company’s games were broadcast on local cable television and satellite systems for quite a reduced price.
The problem with Setanta and other similar broadcasters is the fact it’s all or nothing with them. You either subscribe for the whole month or you don’t see anything. A better option is selling individual games to people who are interested and willing to pay to watch a specific match
Setanta refused to budge on their pricing scheme in Britain and the average fan pushed back and said well “screw you too.” They definitely didn’t help themselves out by listening to what Joe Public had to say, especially in these tough economical times. They are now paying the ultimate price for their stubbornness and have lost their major lifeline.
And what of ESPN, how will they handle and distribute their games, on a pay per view basis ? Well we’ll just have to wait and see what happens. I’m sure not everybody will be happy, but I’m sure they will manage to pay their bills at the end of the day.






